@article {671, title = {The cancer glycocalyx mechanically primes integrin-mediated growth and survival.}, journal = {Nature}, volume = {511}, year = {2014}, month = {2014 Jul 17}, pages = {319-25}, abstract = {

Malignancy is associated with altered expression of glycans and glycoproteins that contribute to the cellular glycocalyx. We constructed a glycoprotein expression signature, which revealed that metastatic tumours upregulate expression of bulky glycoproteins. A computational model predicted that these glycoproteins would influence transmembrane receptor spatial organization and function. We tested this prediction by investigating whether bulky glycoproteins in the glycocalyx promote a tumour phenotype in human cells by increasing integrin adhesion and signalling. Our data revealed that a bulky glycocalyx facilitates integrin clustering by funnelling active integrins into adhesions and altering integrin state by applying tension to matrix-bound integrins, independent of actomyosin contractility. Expression of large tumour-associated glycoproteins in non-transformed mammary cells promoted focal adhesion assembly and facilitated integrin-dependent growth factor signalling to support cell growth and survival. Clinical studies revealed that large glycoproteins are abundantly expressed on circulating tumour cells from patients with advanced disease. Thus, a bulky glycocalyx is a feature of tumour cells that could foster metastasis by mechanically enhancing cell-surface receptor function.

}, keywords = {Animals, Breast, Cell Line, Tumor, Cell Proliferation, Cell Survival, Fibroblasts, Glycocalyx, Glycoproteins, Humans, Immobilized Proteins, Integrins, Mice, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Mucin-1, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasms, Neoplastic Cells, Circulating, Protein Binding, Receptors, Cell Surface}, issn = {1476-4687}, doi = {10.1038/nature13535}, author = {Paszek, Matthew J and DuFort, Christopher C and Rossier, Olivier and Bainer, Russell and Mouw, Janna K and Godula, Kamil and Hudak, Jason E and Lakins, Jonathon N and Wijekoon, Amanda C and Cassereau, Luke and Rubashkin, Matthew G and Magbanua, Mark J and Thorn, Kurt S and Davidson, Michael W and Rugo, Hope S and Park, John W and Hammer, Daniel A and Giannone, Gr{\'e}gory and Bertozzi, Carolyn R and Weaver, Valerie M} } @article {251, title = {Collagen architecture in pregnancy-induced protection from breast cancer.}, journal = {J Cell Sci}, volume = {126}, year = {2013}, month = {2013 Sep 15}, pages = {4108-10}, abstract = {

The reduction in breast cancer risk attributed to early-age pregnancy is mediated in part by changes in the mammary epithelium. Here, we address the role of the mammary stroma in this protection. Utilizing tumor cells capable of transitioning from indolent to proliferative or invasive states, we demonstrate that mammary extracellular matrix (ECM) from parous rats (parous matrix) decreases tumor growth and impedes cellular phenotypes associated with tumor cell invasion compared with that observed using nulliparous matrix. Proteomic analysis identifies an increased abundance of collagen I in parous matrix, an observation extended to breast tissue of parous women. Given the pro-tumorigenic attributes of fibrillar collagen, these results were unexpected. Second-harmonic generation imaging and atomic force microscopy revealed that the abundant collagen observed in the mammary glands of parous rats is less linearized and associated with a decrease in stromal stiffness, implicating collagen organization and stiffness in parity-induced protection. Using 3D cell culture models, we demonstrate that linearized (fibrillar) collagen I induces cellular phenotypes consistent with an invasive behavior in mammary tumor cells and alters the subcellular distribution of β1 integrin. Conversely, high-density non-fibrillar collagen I induces tumor-suppressive attributes, including increases in junctional E-cadherin in tumor cells, upregulation of genes encoding components of cell-cell junctions, and downregulation of mesenchymal-specific and metalloproteinase-encoding genes. These data show that collagen organization, rather than density alone, is a key contributor to the invasive phenotype. Furthermore, our data show that parity alters the composition and organization of mammary ECM, particularly fibrillar collagen, in a manner consistent with tumor suppression.

}, issn = {1477-9137}, doi = {10.1242/jcs.121590}, author = {Maller, Ori and Hansen, Kirk C and Lyons, Traci R and Acerbi, Irene and Weaver, Valerie M and Prekeris, Rytis and Tan, Aik-Choon and Schedin, Pepper} } @article {381, title = {CpG island tumor suppressor promoter methylation in non-BRCA-associated early mammary carcinogenesis.}, journal = {Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev}, volume = {18}, year = {2009}, month = {2009 Mar}, pages = {901-14}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Only 5\% of all breast cancers are the result of BRCA1/2 mutations. Methylation silencing of tumor suppressor genes is well described in sporadic breast cancer; however, its role in familial breast cancer is not known.

METHODS: CpG island promoter methylation was tested in the initial random periareolar fine-needle aspiration sample from 109 asymptomatic women at high risk for breast cancer. Promoter methylation targets included RARB (M3 and M4), ESR1, INK4a/ARF, BRCA1, PRA, PRB, RASSF1A, HIN-1, and CRBP1.

RESULTS: Although the overall frequency of CpG island promoter methylation events increased with age (P\<0.0001), no specific methylation event was associated with age. In contrast, CpG island methylation of RARB M4 (P=0.051), INK4a/ARF (P=0.042), HIN-1 (P=0.044), and PRA (P=0.032), as well as the overall frequency of methylation events (P=0.004), was associated with abnormal Masood cytology. The association between promoter methylation and familial breast cancer was tested in 40 unaffected premenopausal women in our cohort who underwent BRCA1/2 mutation testing. Women with BRCA1/2 mutations had a low frequency of CpG island promoter methylation (15 of 15 women had

CONCLUSIONS: This is the first evidence of CpG island methylation of tumor suppressor gene promoters in non-BRCA1/2 familial breast cancer.

}, keywords = {Biopsy, Fine-Needle, Breast Neoplasms, Chi-Square Distribution, CpG Islands, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16, Cytokines, DNA Methylation, Female, Genes, BRCA1, Genes, BRCA2, Genes, Tumor Suppressor, Humans, Mutation, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Premenopause, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Receptors, Progesterone, Receptors, Retinoic Acid, Risk, Risk Assessment, Statistics, Nonparametric, Tumor Suppressor Proteins}, issn = {1055-9965}, doi = {10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0875}, author = {Vasilatos, Shauna N and Broadwater, Gloria and Barry, William T and Baker, Joseph C and Lem, Siya and Dietze, Eric C and Bean, Gregory R and Bryson, Andrew D and Pilie, Patrick G and Goldenberg, Vanessa and Skaar, David and Paisie, Carolyn and Torres-Hernandez, Alejandro and Grant, Tracey L and Wilke, Lee G and Ibarra-Drendall, Catherine and Ostrander, Julie H and D{\textquoteright}Amato, Nicholas C and Zalles, Carola and Jirtle, Randy and Weaver, Valerie M and Seewaldt, Victoria L} }